Showing posts with label ti west. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ti west. Show all posts

Sunday, September 18, 2022

pearl


Self-delusion and desperation can be a dangerous combination. This is the predicament of Pearl, the title character (Mia Goth) of Ti West's horror film. It's an origin story of his earlier release, X, a deliciously and unabashedly sleazy, southern fried 1979-set fright-romp. Both movies were made on paltry million dollar budgets, and both films make quite the striking pairing. As melodramatic pastiche, Pearl in particular is so unusual for contemporary movies in its tone and visual style. It's the kind of film that is jarring against the slew of washed out, dimly-lit serious arthouse horror pictures and the branded, jump scare-filled cash grab horror movies I'm used to viewing in cushy recliner seats of mainstream theaters. It's admirable that with both films, West seems to be enjoying himself, creating splashy art he wants to make, with little care for the palate of an imagined modern audience--whatever that might be, as we all seem so splintered lately. But Pearl doesn't feel so self-serving that it isn't entertaining. Its tight runtime and lean tale becomes a pleasurable experience even as it forays to the most unsavory images (a dead pig riddled with squirmy maggots, for example, was enough to make me uneasy). 

Pearl yearns of being a dancer in the picture shows--she lives on a dull farm in the midst of the 1918 pandemic with her extraordinarily stern, German immigrant mother Ruth (Tandi Wright) and her ailing father (Matthew Sunderland), rendered speechless and of limited movement likely by stroke. Her husband Howard (Alistair Sewell) is off at war. The plot, like its mis-en-scene, is quite stilted and antiquated, set up with its bright, goldenrod photography (vividly done by Eliot Rockett) and screen wipes, like a creaky thirties or forties color weepie. Pearl's character is shot in a very lonesome way, in fields or along desolate roads or among her cute farm animals--her closest companions--that cower from her overwhelming presence. As she rides her bike, she's reminiscent of Margaret Hamilton's Miss Gulch. But West's film and Goth's performance surveys Pearl with an empathetic eye. Both West's material and Goth's turn (who also wrote the film with West) toe that line between zany, zingy caricature and moldy realities. Like Pearl's dead-end existence, the movie can feel repetitive, with the round and around strict mother theme [a trope in horror, most acutely in Psycho [a car sinks in a swamp here too) and Carrie] almost suffocating the whole movie--but that stifling build-up is necessary for the thrills in the later half to feel so stirring. 

It's not necessarily an unpredictable movie--it seems to want to ride on and luxuriate in its formulas. Tyler Bates and Timothy Williams' lush, swelling string score aids in that as well. But winky, cutesy moments are offset by piercingly bizarre ones--like a dance with a scarecrow (and its utterly disconcerting face) that goes from goofily Wizard of Oz-ish to macabre. When Goth is given a monologue for the horror movie ages--she absolutely destroys it--the camera lingering on her much longer than what feels comfortable (this sense of the uncomfortably long and the pleasure in the unsatisfyingly unknown was also so tremendous in West's The House of the Devil). Like Todd Haynes'  Douglas Sirk-inspired Far from Heaven, Pearl feels very queer. Unlike Haynes' film, I'm not sure if that was as such an intentional aspect here. But the filmic inspirations, the dashingly handsome symbolic projectionist (David Corenswet) seemingly as promise to break out of small town and small-mindedness doldrums, and Pearl's dresses (and gender queer moments--with a top hat) and misfit nature, her disapproving, Christian parent, are all wound up in a feverish sense of gay identity. Between this and X, West sure is creating an exciting universe within the genre, and showcasing his prowess with period detail and tones of simultaneous frivolity, humor, devastation (that closing shot of Goth illuminates it all, and it is a wow). ***1/2


-Jeffery Berg


Tuesday, July 26, 2022

pearl


Looking forward to Pearl, directed by Ti West. 

X remains one of my favorite movies of the year so far.


Friday, August 23, 2013

lookin' for the magic


Some thrills, bits of black comedy and a kick-ass heroine shape Adam Wingard's You're Next, a 2011 home invasion horror flick released smartly this late-summer by Lionsgate (the eerily coy trailer featured Lou Reed's "Perfect Day") after festival buzz. Wingard situates his tale in a rambling English Tudor in a remote woodsy landscape where husband (Rob Moran) and wife (Barbara Crampton) are celebrating their 35 year anniversary by gathering their family together. Once the patriarchs and their kin--all nervous and forlorn and somewhat combative with one another--and their unwillingly-dragged-there significant others sit down for dinner, they are suddenly attacked by bow and arrow wielding assailants in dime store plastic animal masks.

As he showed in his cheeky retina cam freakout for V/H/S 2, Wingard is best at creating mood and having some fun with the material.  The familiar slasher conceit opening is set to a disarming wavy 70s power pop tune (Dwight Twilley's "Lookin' for the Magic" which is remade by band Mind the Gap for the End Titles) played on repeat on a CD disc changer.  Like much of today's best terror cinema, like this year's spook house spectacular The Conjuring, the movie drips with nostalgia for the VHS horror rental era. There's also a few electro-rock digs in the effectively simple score (by Mads Heldtberg, Jasper Justice Lee, and Kyle McKinnon).  




I was able to forgive the sloppiness of the plot and Simon Barrett's script (the film does lose its way and tension once the intruders are unmasked) thanks to its nervy humor, fearless survivalist-trained Aussie final girl (played by Sharni Vinson), the well-honed setting, and the general sense of filmmaker and cast comradeship the film exudes (Wingard's cast includes indie-horror prince Ti West and many "Mumblecore" cohorts plus Chopping Mall / From Beyond starrer Crampton as in-joke).


I wish the movie lingered around more through the mansion a la Ti West's House of the Devil, but I think there's likely more than meets the eye on first viewing.  The shaky cam gets carried away and too obvious during the kills when the movie feels at its best mimicking the steady appearance of that stately manor.  But we do end up being treated to a pretty spectacular death via blender. ***


-Jeffery Berg

Monday, July 26, 2010

revisiting the house of the devil



I'm joining in on Final Girl's Film Club this week for the first time with a revisit to one of my favorites, The House of the Devil. I originally reviewed the film here as "refreshingly low-key."

It's always exciting for a horror buff to discover that hidden gem. On IFC, I caught 1980's The Hearse, a drive-in ghost story about a woman (Trish Van Devere) who is terrorized by a mysterious hearse while staying at her dead aunt's house. It's not particularly good but I can appreciate its vibe. It seems to me whether or not you "enjoy" a film like The Hearse, will likely dictate your feelings on how you feel about The House of the Devil. West dubs it as a "period piece," something rarely mentioned in reviews of the film. So inspired by this particular Hearse era, West nails texture. All of the details are exactly right. The orange foam headphones, the tangled phone cord, the jokey answering machine message, paper Coke cups, the soundtrack choices (as the Greg Kihn Band's "The Breakup Song" suggests, Hollywood lamentably really doesn't write horror films like this anymore) the backpacks and denim, the moody score (by Jeff Grace) and film quality--shot on 16mm (abundant in the 1980s).

The script is also refreshingly free of too many in-jokes, which seems typical and crippling of film throwbacks, spoofs or tributes (the inclusion of Dee Wallace as "The Landlady" is such a perfectly earnest choice, not a cheesy wink). In an interview with Cinematical, West commented, "So when I set it in the '80s, a lot of people call it a homage or a throwback and I don't really see it that way. I'm not so ignorant to say there isn't a few nods in the movie, but really just wanted to make an authentic period piece; if the movie had taken place in the '50s, I'd have made it as authentically '50s as possible." And yet the way the film is done, it suggests homage. Think of how differently Far From Heaven would be perceived if not filmed in that lush, Douglas Sirk-ish style. Aside from the freeze frame opening and closing credits, here, the blandness (Jocelin Donahue is our very ordinary heroine) is part of its charm: the film seems to run in real-time fashion, building slowly to its bloody conclusion. That episodic build-up has divided critics and film goers, used to quicker, more complex plot lines. And the climax isn't necessarily as riveting as it could have been. Hollywood Reporter's Kirk Honeycutt bemoaned that "the story takes place in the late 1980s for no apparent reason other than writer-director-editor Ti West doesn't want mobile phones to gum up his feeble plot." Of course horror buffs are smarter than that and know why the 1980s are important to the intrinsic feel of the picture. And it's so obvi that this is not late-80s but early or mid (Gerwig suggests in an interview that West was adamant that it was taking place in '83).

Since much of the running time is spent on our heroine bumbling around a house, I can understand why horror fans may not really like the film. It came out in the midst of feverish underground hype (the trailer is excellent), not to mention its slick, nostalgic marketing (the retro posters and clamshell video release). West's strength is with creating a banal atmosphere not typically seen in film today (atmosphere instantly conjures flashy sci fi and prize winning novel adaptations). Even the pace of the movie itself (The Hearse is pretty slow burn, suspense-less stuff too) is part of the atmosphere as well.


Since I first saw the movie, it's been great to see the rise of Greta Gerwig who was so memorably Terri Garr-esque in Greenberg. As the quirky friend in Devil, she's both annoying and endearing and seems to be having a great time. She remarks, "I think people took to it because, in many ways, it is the antithesis of the way people think of lo-fi horror movies looking. People are hungry for good, small movies that have some style."


-Jeffery Berg



My friend Katie, a Connecticuit native, was kind enough to snap this photo of the actual house in Lime Rock. I love it!


Saturday, October 3, 2009

house of the devil

















Is this the first horror movie in some time where instead of one thing to the next thing, one thing leads to another (as the song in the film suggests)?

Horror fans who are weary of the loud, suspense-less Michael Bay remakes, will likely enjoy Ti West's House of the Devil. It's relatively quiet and burns slow, similar in plot to Rosemary's Baby.

On the eve of a lunar eclipse, a college student, Samantha Hughes (a perfectly dour and ordinary Jocelin Donahue), desperate for money, takes on a babysitting job. Snooping alone in her client's (a spooky Tom Noonan) mysterious old house, she slowly begins to realize why she's there.

Set somewhere in the early 80s, there are a lot of great details: a Walkman with orange foam headphones, rotary telephones, paper Coke cups, denim backpacks, acid wash. The story itself is like something out of an "Unsolved Mysteries" rerun.

With his use of 16mm, West is knowing with the look of the film and his freeze frame, 70s styled title and end credits. Dee Wallace appears as "The Landlady". But the movie never really veers into camp, it seems instead, quite earnest and serious. I found the moodiness to be refreshingly low-key, reminding me of Nixon-era thrillers like Let's Scare Jessica to Death and Robert Altman's Images. I hope West gives us a follow up. I'm eager to see what he'll do next. ***1/2




Be sure to read this interesting interview with Ti West & article by Karina Longworth.

And Nick Shager's Slant review is pretty spot-on.